D 2019-09-27T22:58:24.122 L branch/double-dash-flag N text/x-markdown P 4a5ab01fd4f1081457e027e2090ccd6ad16e72d42d492271d2e4cb0a1bcfbde8 U stephan W 3879 # Management Summary The `double-dash-flag` branch aims to add support for the conventional interpretation of a `--` flag: all arguments after the first instance of `--` are to be treated as non-flag arguments (e.g. file/wiki/branch/whatever names). This feature request is from: The implementation is not *100%* compliant with POSIX/Unix conventions because it cannot be without *Breaking Stuff*, but it "should" be close enough to be useful/conventional for the contexts where using `--` makes sense in Fossil. For example, `uv add` treats a filename of `-` as `stdin` by default (and has valid use cases enabled by that), and `--` could be used to make `uv add` treat `-` as a filename ([that's the original use case for which conventional `--` support was proposed](https://www.fossil-scm.org/forum/forumpost/d6fa7422db)). # Compatibility vs. Historical Behaviour Fossil's [historical handling of `--` is really weird](/artifact?ln=925-928&name=a35b33b329ab2038): the *first* time `find_option()` encounters `--`, it *removes* that flag and stops processing arguments. Subsequent calls to `find_option()` then never see `--` and thus treat all arguments as potential flags (even those after the prior position of `--`). Since that behaviour was never useful, and potentially confusing, it is unexpected that the changes made in this branch will break any historical usage of the CLI commands. For example: fossil foo -- -a -b -c The current (trunk, as of this writing) interpretation of `-a -b -c`, because of the "one-time-swallowing" of `--`, depends on what order those flags are checked for via `find_option()`. It seems highly unlikely that anyone could have reliably depended on that, and therefore seems unlikely that this change will break anyone's scripts. Commands which accept a filename as the value of a flag are unaffected by these changes, provided the flag comes before `--`: fossil foo -R - -- -a -b -c Would (both before and after this change) treat `-` as a repository file name, but this change will cause the subsequent `-a -b -c` flags to be interpreted as non-flags (it's then up to the `foo` command to deal with them). # This Implementation's Behaviour 1) `find_option()` and its variants always stop looking for flags when they encounter `--`. 2) `verify_all_options()` triggers a fatal error if `--` is found in the argument list. 3) `verify_all_options2()` consumes the first instance of `--` and records the `g.argv` index where `--` was found in `g.argDashDashIndex`, so that commands which need to can determine whether, e.g., an argument of `-` should be treated as an alias for `stdin`/`stdout` or as a literal filename (the latter only applies if `--` *precedes* the `-` argument). The utility function `get_dash_filename_arg()` makes that particular use case trivial to implement. It seems, after having migrated many of the commands, that it would be harmless/risk-free to eliminate `verify_all_options2()` and have `verify_all_options()` adopt that function's behaviour. That would make the `--` flag a harmless no-op for commands which don't/can't make any special use of it. # (ONGOING) List of commands/subcommands extended to support `--` (Please keep this list alphabetized by command/subcommand name.) * `add` * `annotate` * `artifact` * `branch new`: you might recall Johnny Cash's song *The Branch Named --Sue*. * `cat` * `changes` * `clean` * `clone` * `commit` * `diff`/`gdiff` * `extras` * `finfo` * `grep` * `ls` * `mv` * `new`/`init` * `rm` * `uv add | cat | edit | export | rm` (noting that `export` has one pathological(?) corner case which we can't 100% accommodate: double-dashing the UVFILE name without applying double-dash to the output file name). * `wiki commit | create | export` Z 749084151bf4f6cac6f4e96862b6b05b